1 = best; 2 = good; 3 = needs improvement
| Summary of OL Referee Evaluation Forms for the "best 30/80/DZ" Referee | ||||||||||
| Evaluations | ||||||||||
| Item | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total | No. Evals. | Average | ||
| 30 minute | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | ||
| check-in | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1.2 | ||
| on time | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | ||
| uniform | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1.2 | ||
| neat | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1.2 | ||
| close to play | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 2.8 | ||
| 18 yd 80% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 5 | 2.8 | ||
| at DZ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 2.4 | ||
| fitness | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 3 | ||
| respect | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 2.6 | ||
| fraternizing | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | ||
| decisions | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 2.2 | ||
| consistent | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 2.4 | ||
| composure | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 2.2 | ||
| in position | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 3 | ||
| information | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 1.8 | ||
| signals | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 1.8 | ||
| acceptance | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 2.6 | ||
| playoff rec | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 5 | 2.6 | ||
1 = best; 2 = good; 3 = needs improvement |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| Coach Comments: | ||||||||||
| 1) this referee was not fit; needs to run more and be in better position to make calls; stayed in center all game! | ||||||||||
| 2) referee and ARs worked well together; they handled intense situations well. | ||||||||||
| 3) this referee showed respect to me and my players; recommend her for the playoffs. | ||||||||||